August 29, 2019 | permalink
(Back in April, the Trapeze Group invited me to deliver the opening keynote at their annual ThinkTransit conference. Given the opportunity to address public transportation officials from across the U.S. and Canada, I didn’t hold back. A recap of my talk appears below.)
HOW PUBLIC TRANSPORT CAN DRIVE FUTURE MOBILITY
On Monday’s opening keynote, Greg Lindsay presented the transit industry with a critical challenge – how to become the core of tomorrow’s multi-modal transport ecosystem. Guiding ThinkTransit 2019 participants through the increasingly complex landscape of multiple, competing services, Greg outlined the issues confronting public transit and identified opportunities for transit agencies to define mobility’s future.
Declining ridership, rising car sales, and the emergence of new ride-hailing and bike-sharing enterprises are changing the industry’s outlook on service provision. Greg’s keynote focused on three themes affecting how transit agencies are moving forward – Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS), micromobility and congestion pricing.
Mobility-as-a-Service: Public Square or Walled Gardens?
The traditional thinking on MaaS is to create an integrated system where public transit works with private vendors to deliver seamlessness for the passenger journey. An example is Portland’s TriMet app, which combines Lyft (ride-share), car2go (car-share) and BIKETOWN (bike-share), to offer a first- and last-mile solution. Another is Whim, a subscription service founded by Finnish entrepreneur Sampo Hietanen, which provides mobility options much like an all-you-can-eat data plan for your cellphone.
MaaS is meant to strengthen public-private partnerships and ensure that public transit remains at the forefront of an integrated transport system.
The aggressive market ambitions of transportation network companies like Uber and Lyft, however, are changing the game for public transport as well as the approach to Mobility-as-a-Service. Uber is moving ahead of transit agencies to own the customer relationship and the entire transaction in this shared mobility scheme. Lyft is not far behind.
By adding public transportation, car- and bike-sharing to their apps, TNCs are creating a vertically-integrated ecosystem that incorporates public transit, and not the other way around.
We need open data
How does public transit get back into the game, so to speak? Greg pointed to Open APIs as a possible way forward. Promoting interoperability prevents TNCs from running vertically-integrated walled gardens with little oversight and allows transit agencies to demand open standards so public transit services align with those of mobility providers.
Examples of these are NACTO’s SharedStreets initiative, which creates an open-source database for exchanging street-level geographic information and Los Angeles Department of Transportation’s own Mobility Data Specification (MDS) which tracks scooter and bike movements.
The challenge, however, would be to compel these private mobility providers to share useful information. Greg notes that Uber and Lyft have used the Freedom of Information Act to lock up their granular data from potential competitors.
Micromobility: Friend or Foe to Transit?
The rise of bike-sharing and e-scooters further complicates the emerging mobility landscape. Micromobility has been a hot transportation trend, with the data showing that scooters are being adopted faster than Uber and Lyft.
However, while micromobility steals rides from TNCs, helping to ease congestion, it also threatens to compete with public transit, oddly creating a scenario of ‘monetizing walking’. The acquisitions of JUMP by Uber and Motivate by Lyft also strengthen the TNCs’ push to dominate the industry, compounding the problem for public transit.
The challenge confronting the industry is how to ensure that micromobility complements public transit, instead of eating into its market.
Greg notes, though, that micromobility has its share of problems, which may affect its sustainability. Ridership plummets during cold weather and big names like Lime and Bird are having trouble getting additional financing. The scooters break easily, too, lasting an average of 23 days.
How Will We Pay for It? Congestion Pricing and More
Congestion pricing adds another layer of complexity to mobility’s future.
New York’s congestion pricing initiative promises to be a game-changer if implemented, offering a viable solution to traffic gridlocks in dense urban areas.
Greg focused his talk on the future of our priced roads and how the technology can allow for flexibility to allocate lane space to various transport modes, enabling free access for some and creating fee structures for others.
In laying out what must be done for public transit to move forward, Greg pointed to the paradoxical nature of public support for transit:
In 2016, 71 percent of Angeleno voters passed Measure M, raising $120 billion for transport over 40 years. At the same time, ridership on the LA Metro has dropped 19.7 percent over five years.
In other words, people overwhelmingly support mass transit for others, but not for themselves.
Greg’s underlying message as he ended his keynote: the industry needs to examine how to make transit more appealing and position it to be the backbone of a shared mobility ecosystem.
» Folllow me on Twitter.
» Email me.
» See upcoming events.
Greg Lindsay is a generalist, urbanist, futurist, and speaker. He is a non-resident senior fellow of the Arizona State University Threatcasting Lab, a non-resident senior fellow of MIT’s Future Urban Collectives Lab, and a non-resident senior fellow of the Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Strategy Initiative. He was the founding chief communications officer of Climate Alpha and remains a senior advisor. Previously, he was an urban tech fellow at Cornell Tech’s Jacobs Institute, where he explored the implications of AI and augmented reality at urban scale.
January 31, 2024
Unfrozen: Domo Arigatou, “Mike 2.0”
January 22, 2024
The Future of Generative AI in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction
January 18, 2024
The Promise and Perils of the Augmented City
January 13, 2024
Henley & Partners: Generative AI, Human Labor, and Mobility
----- | January 22, 2024
The Future of Generative AI in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction
----- | January 1, 2024
----- | August 3, 2023
CityLab | June 12, 2023
Augmented Reality Is Coming for Cities
CityLab | April 25, 2023
The Line Is Blurring Between Remote Workers and Tourists
CityLab | December 7, 2021
The Dark Side of 15-Minute Grocery Delivery
Fast Company | June 2021
Why the Great Lakes need to be the center of our climate strategy
Fast Company | March 2020
How to design a smart city that’s built on empowerment–not corporate surveillance
URBAN-X | December 2019
CityLab | December 10, 2018
The State of Play: Connected Mobility in San Francisco, Boston, and Detroit
Harvard Business Review | September 24, 2018
Why Companies Are Creating Their Own Coworking Spaces
CityLab | July 2018
The State of Play: Connected Mobility + U.S. Cities
Medium | May 1, 2017
Fast Company | January 19, 2017
The Collaboration Software That’s Rejuvenating The Young Global Leaders Of Davos
The Guardian | January 13, 2017
What If Uber Kills Public Transport Instead of Cars
Backchannel | January 4, 2017
The Office of the Future Is… an Office
New Cities Foundation | October 2016
Now Arriving: A Connected Mobility Roadmap for Public Transport
Inc. | October 2016
Why Every Business Should Start in a Co-Working Space
Popular Mechanics | May 11, 2016
Can the World’s Worst Traffic Problem Be Solved?
The New Republic | January/February 2016